Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed right here belong solely to the writer and don’t symbolize the views and opinions of crypto.information’ editorial.
The 2024 US presidential election showcased the general public’s rising enthusiasm for prediction markets and citizen journalism. Nevertheless, whereas blockchain-backed choices promise to empower residents like by no means earlier than, essentially the most urgent difficulty impacting the way forward for our authorities stays voter privateness and safety. Paper methods are expensive and gradual, and present digital voting methods lack privateness, transparency and accessibility—undermining belief in democracy.
You may also like: US voters gave a ‘pro-crypto’ mandate—what occurs now? | Opinion
Enter zero-knowledge proofs: a cryptographic technique that ensures privacy-preserving, succinct, and unfalsifiable proofs that supply a transformative resolution for nationwide elections. By enabling verifiable, tamper-proof votes, ZKPs can revolutionize democratic processes, guaranteeing voter privateness, election integrity, and transparency with out reliance on trusted authorities. ZKPs have the potential to unlock mathematically safe democracies.
Understanding the place and the way paper ballots went flawed
Regardless of technological developments in each operate of our on a regular basis lives, the US voting system nonetheless largely depends on paper ballots. In truth, in August of this 12 months, it was projected that 98% of all votes for presidential candidates in November can be solid on paper. Whereas paper methods are sometimes seen as safe, they inherently require belief and go away voter knowledge susceptible to breaches, misuse, and identification theft.
Moreover, conventional methods supply little transparency or mechanisms for voters to confirm their vote’s integrity, fueling public scepticism and disinformation. For instance, the 2020 US elections noticed widespread allegations partly as a result of voters lacked a dependable solution to confirm outcomes independently. As we’ve seen, insecure methods erode belief and perpetuate myths about electoral integrity.
How conventional strategies of digital voting supply flawed methods
Whereas digital methods have been launched to modernize elections and cut back prices, they nonetheless pose a big threat to honest elections and include trade-offs in safety and belief. That’s as a result of these methods depend on centralized intermediaries, making them susceptible to tampering, coercion and privateness violations.
Early makes an attempt to handle these points, akin to blockchain-based methods, introduce decentralization and self-tallying. Nevertheless, these blockchain-based methods typically fell in need of addressing scalability and securing voter’s private data. The dearth of any true privateness inherent to present decentralized blockchain expertise runs the chance of compromising voter privateness, exposing each a voter’s identification and poll selections, not in contrast to paper or conventional digital methods.
What’s wanted is a technological system that may guarantee voter integrity and privateness and stop manipulation whereas decreasing the info that’s saved on-chain—one thing that permits for sooner and extra environment friendly vote processing with out compromising safety. That is the place ZKP expertise stands out. By resolving the trade-offs between transparency and privateness whereas sustaining scalability, ZKPs present a basis for safe, verifiable, and environment friendly voting.
Introducing ZK proofs: The subsequent-gen resolution to voter integrity
ZKPs supply the very resolution wanted to guard voter privateness and allow scalable voting processes. That’s as a result of ZKPs permit a voter to show eligibility or vote validity with out revealing their identification or vote alternative, guaranteeing each privateness and integrity within the course of. To take action, ZKPs depend on mathematical rules that allow the verification of claims, akin to vote validity in elections, with out disclosing any private knowledge or delicate particulars. Moreover, ZK off-chain computations can deal with scalability points in blockchain-based e-voting methods. By decreasing on-chain storage necessities, this technique makes dealing with large-scale elections possible whereas sustaining transparency, privateness, and common verifiability.
Right here’s a extra in-depth take a look at how ZKPs can construct mathematically safe democracies and resolve points with present digital voting methods:
1. Defending voter anonymity: ZKPs permit voters to authenticate the validity of their vote or different documentation with out revealing underlying private knowledge or paperwork, thus defending their privateness. That is made attainable via the three parts of the ZKP’s algorithm: completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge. Completeness works like this: a press release (X) is true, and each the prover and the verifier accurately comply with the protocol, the verifier should settle for the proof as true. The proof can’t be falsified, guaranteeing reliability. Equally, the soundness part signifies that if the assertion (X) is fake, the verifier is not going to be satisfied by the proof, even when everybody follows the protocol accurately.
2. Enabling decentralized record-keeping: In a ZKP system, a decentralized and clear ledger (the blockchain) data votes, establishing accountability and safety.
3. Making certain voting transparency and integrity: ZKPs allow a collusion-resistant system that empowers voters to confirm that their vote was precisely recorded within the tally with out revealing their vote preferences, guaranteeing belief and integrity within the voting course of.
4. Establishing mathematical safety: ZKPs present strong ensures, confirming that the voting protocol is safe.
Actual-world functions of ZKPs in voting
ZKP-based voting is now not theoretical. In October 2024, Georgia’s main opposition social gathering, the United Nationwide Motion, launched “United House,” an identification app constructed by Rarimo, a protocol specializing in decentralized digital identities. This app makes use of blockchain and ZKPs to make sure safe and nameless voting, aiming to fight low voter turnout by rewarding participation and defending voter identities.
Different initiatives like zkPassport, Anon Aandhaar, and OpenPassport reveal the potential for integrating ZKPs into identification verification methods, proving attributed data like nationality or age with out exposing privateness data.
Current limitations of ZKP-based identification
Whereas ZKPs supply groundbreaking potential for safe voting methods, they nonetheless face challenges, notably their reliance on passports for verification. Passport possession just isn’t common—solely round 50% of the US inhabitants holds a sound passport, and charges are a lot decrease in lots of growing nations. Furthermore, passports lack biometric validation, making them prone to fraud via stolen or counterfeit paperwork. Corrupt issuing authorities may theoretically manipulate voting outcomes by creating invalid paperwork that nonetheless move verification.
One other basic problem lies within the persistence of cryptographic signatures related to revoked or changed passports. Even when a doc is now not legitimate, its digital signature typically stays usable, introducing a threat of misuse. Lastly, many ZKP-based methods depend on a single level of verification—usually a passport—somewhat than aggregating attestations from a number of sources, akin to nationwide ID methods, banking establishments, or cellular carriers. This reliance will increase the probability of system failures or manipulation.
An answer to those challenges exists in increasing the sources of identification verification to incorporate attestations from various and trusted attestors. Incorporating biometric validation into the passport verification course of may considerably cut back dangers related to stolen or borrowed paperwork. Moreover, the event of cryptographic requirements that permit for the invalidation of outdated signatures would deal with vulnerabilities posed by revoked or changed paperwork.
ZKPs symbolize a paradigm shift in safe voting, addressing vulnerabilities in conventional and blockchain-based methods. By enabling mathematically safe, privacy-preserving elections, ZKPs have the potential to foster belief, transparency, and participation in democratic processes. As ZKP expertise evolves, it holds the potential to unlock democracies that aren’t solely safe but in addition extra inclusive, equitable, and participatory.
This text was co-authored by Andre Omietanskiand Amal Ibraymi.
Learn extra: Blockchain tech can restore belief in US elections | Opinion
Andre Omietanski & Amal Ibraymi
Andre Omietanski is common counsel at Aztec Labs, which is growing the privacy-first Layer-2 on Ethereum that allows builders to construct privacy-preserving functions whereas guaranteeing compliance. Andre spent over a decade at White & Case in London, the place he left as counsel, gaining in depth, international and various expertise in advanced conventional finance transactions. Previous to becoming a member of Aztec Labs, he was a crypto advisor to early-stage startups within the Ethereum, Cosmos and Polkadot ecosystems.
Amal Ibraymi is the authorized counsel at Aztec Labs, the place she helps the corporate’s authorized efforts to advocate for privacy-enhancing applied sciences and decentralized finance. Earlier than becoming a member of Aztec, Amal was a privateness affiliate on the New York and Paris workplaces of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, the place she suggested on knowledge safety, cryptography, and international privateness compliance. Amal additionally beforehand labored on the Workplace of Authorized Affairs on the United Nations Secretariat in New York Metropolis, the Worldwide Court docket of Arbitration of the Worldwide Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, and as a Privateness Fellow on the OECD within the Paris headquarters. Amal is dually educated within the U.S. and France, holding an LLM from NYU Faculty of Regulation and a JD/MA from Sciences Po Paris.
